u are gorgeous... your face is amazing in beauty alone your figure and pose it magnificent to boot! your pictures are striking. I think you need a more dramatic background, epic scenery that forms to your figure n placement. I only glanced at your modeling pics so dont judge me or yourself just subconscious critic. I think it would really take you and your form to another level. I actually am an art student who has taken several nude classes, I just wish you were One of the models i had( to many dudes lol) keep it up whatever your doing ha! well casual observers glace anyways, Hope pursuit in your dream succeeds and it if doesn't, only Thing I can say it couldn't have been from beauty lol. Have a nice life and make sure your man deserves a beauty.
All I gather from your gallery and this image is that you'd like to be a photographer for Playboy, or some sort of softcore porn pic site. Please elaborate what is artistic about this nude, because getting guys to jerk to it isn't artistic in the least.
:CCCC I hope you're joking, the body is beautiful and all (speaking in general, male or female, etc) but this is no way artistic in the least, else we call all nudes artistic that have nothing to present but a nude female in a standard pose, and wet from a fresh shower.
There is nothing explicit about this picture and a person can really see the beauty of the model. A picture doesn't have to have dramatic lighting where someone can barely see the model for her shadow to be called art. Or perhaps you think a picture where we can't even see anything but a model's leg. That's no more art than explicitly pornographic pictures. If you don't like seeing nude people, then don't come here; likewise if you want to discuss what you do and don't consider art, there are better places than here for it.
Since art is the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, what AzaraGore is trying to express is that a photograph of a wet, nude woman possesses no creativity or imagination. For example, a self portrait would not be considered art, but simply a photograph.
Now art in the female form is bogus as it is not a creative or imaginative activity, or a product thereof. If there is a painting of a vase, the vase itself is not art but an object, the female body in the picture is just a person.
Ah, ha. My definition of art is narrow because I don't find a facebook wannabe model shot of a nude women artsy? I rather indulge myself in "finer" arts that are more in-tuned to my tastes and interests, the female form is beautiful and all and I admire it or else I would've gotten a sex change by now but this, in my honest opinion, is not art. There are plenty of people that feel the same just look at the comments before me.